Internet use has become ubiquitous in the past two
decades, but governments, legislators and their regulatory agencies are falling
further behind rapidly changing Internet technologies and uses. In a
ground-breaking collaboration, regulatory lawyer Marsden and computer scientist
Brown analyze the regulatory shaping of "code"--the technological
environment of the Internet--to achieve more economically efficient and
socially just regulation. They examine five hard cases that illustrate the
regulatory crisis: privacy and data protection, copyright and creativity
incentives, censorship, social networks and user-generated content, and net
neutrality. The authors describe the increasing
"multistakeholderisation" of Internet governance, in which user groups
are arguing for representation in the closed business-government dialogue, to
bring in both rights-based and technologically expert perspectives. They draw
out lessons for better future regulation from the regulatory and
interoperability failures illustrated by the five cases. They conclude that
governments, users and better functioning markets need a smarter "prosumer
law" approach. Prosumer law would be designed to enhance the competitive
production of public goods, including innovation, public safety, and fundamental
democratic rights.
Ian Brown is Senior Research Fellow at Oxford University's Oxford Internet Institute. He is the editor of the 'Research Handbook on Internet Governance' (Elgar 2013). Christopher T. Marsden is Professor in Law at the
University of Essex School of Law. He is the author of Net Neutrality: Towardsa Co-Regulatory Solution (2010), Internet Co-regulation (2011) and three otherbooks.
No comments:
Post a Comment